
For this search, I decided to
search only for “cybersecurity” hits that were published in the last year. I
also decided to remove “Company Profiles”, as those hits had not been useful to
me in previous LexisNexis searches I have done with previous employers. One the
results page, I decided to further limit my search to the industry “Information
Security & Privacy”.
The article I found was a short
news clip that was similar in topic to the article that I found through DIALOG –
“Technology: Dissecting The First Version of the NIST’s Cybersecurity Framework”.
I learned today that NIST – the National
Institute of Standards and Technology – does not create standards that are
required by law. While they are recommendations for best practices and
sometimes lead to regulations, companies are not required by law to meet these
standards. However, their publications are influential within the industry.
Similar to DIALOG, I recommend limiting your search to a specific industry if possible. It made my results much more targeted and more relevant to the type of information I was seeking. Some topics do not lend themselves well to this process, but cybersecurity definitely fell comfortably under "information security".
Reflection
In my previous work as a
paralegal for a major plaintiff’s law firm, I used LexisNexis daily and there
is truly nothing like it for searching for case summaries and case law. The
indexing on court cases (particularly the ability to search cases by subject)
found in LexisNexis is far superior to other products on the market (for
example, WestLaw) and I highly recommend LexisNexis as the first stop for any
legal searches that need to be done. However, I find LexisNexis to be much
slower than other databases we have used and not as intuitive. I would hesitate
to put a user with little experience searching databases to work with
LexisNexis because the number of results returned is so high and limiting your
results takes practice. In general, I would say that I prefer other databases
interfaces (such as JSTOR’s or the various ProQuest databases) over that of LexisNexis,
especially for materials such as articles that are archived in other databases.
No comments:
Post a Comment